Framing Migration and Belonging: A Critical Discourse Analysis of European Prime Ministerial Speeches

  • . Anwar Turki Atiyah College of Computer Science and Information Technology
Keywords: Migration Discourse, , Conditional Belonging, , Postcolonial Theory, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), ), European Political Speeches

Abstract

This study conducts a critical discourse analysis of European prime ministerial speeches on migration and national belonging, using Fairclough’s three-dimensional model and Nair’s postcolonial theory. It explores how political discourse constructs migration as a site of legitimacy and control, focusing on language that shapes conditional belonging and exclusion. The findings reveal that both speeches reproduce bordered humanitarianism, where migrants are framed through crisis narratives, legal vulnerability, and procedural compliance. Europe is discursively positioned as a normative center of ethical and legal governance, while migrant legitimacy is granted selectively based on legality or suffering. The study highlights the persistence of postcolonial hierarchies in European discourse and calls for more inclusive, agentive, and epistemologically just models of migrant representation

References

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness, 8(2), 71–83.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. and Ruth W. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse as Social Interaction –Discourse Studies: a Multidisciplinary Introduction Vol.2. Ed. Teun a. Van
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Kress, G., & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as ideology. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mains, S., Mountz, A., & Walton-Roberts, M. (2013). Postcolonial migrations and the politics of displacement. In M. Walton-Roberts & K. H. H. Coe (Eds.), Critical geographies of migration (pp. 23–42). Springer.
Nair, P. (2013). Migration, dislocation and belonging in postcolonial Europe. In P.
Nair & S. Mains (Eds.), Migration and postcoloniality: Legacies and dialogues (pp. 15–34). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Sadiq, K. (2021). The postcolonial migration state: Mobility, documentation, and sovereignty. Migration Studies, 9(3), 456–472.
Samaddar, R. (2020). Borders and postcoloniality: The geopolitics of migration. Postcolonial Studies, 23(4), 489–506.
Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds) (2002) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam&Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Van Dijk, T. 1985. Introduction: Discourse Analysis as a New Cross-discipline. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Retrieved from
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan
Published
2026-02-06
How to Cite
Atiyah, . A. (2026). Framing Migration and Belonging: A Critical Discourse Analysis of European Prime Ministerial Speeches. Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Humanities Sciences, 28(4), 71-88. Retrieved from https://www.journalart.qu.edu.iq.51-77-64-103.cpanel.site/index.php/QJHS/article/view/1292
Section
Articles