Interpreting the Non-Literal Meaning in Selected Scenes of "The Family Plan" Movie

  • Ro'ya Lateef Talib المديرية العامة لتربية كركوك
Keywords: pragmatics, literal, , non-literal, indirect speech act, implicature

Abstract

Pragmatics is that filed of language that studies the intended meaning behind words and sentences. It studies the non-literal meaning of words and sentences which does not exist in the dictionary, otherwise it depends on the context and cultural knowledge of the listener. Many English learners confront difficulties in interpreting the non-literal meaning behind idioms, metaphor, irony, or indirect speech. The researcher attempts to investigate how such meanings are employed in real-life like contexts and how learners can get benefit from it in developing proficiency in language use. The aim of this study is to analyze the non-literal language in selected scenes of the "The Family Plan" movie. Since this analysis can help to improve the pragmatic competence among EFL learners. It is hypothesized that non-literal expressions are more frequently used in scenes involving conflict or humor. The researcher conducts a qualitative-content analysis to (15) selected scenes from "The Family Plan" movie. Scenes are selected depending on the existence of idioms, metaphor, irony, or indirect speech. The researcher has adopted Grice's maxims of conversational implicature and Searle's taxonomy of speech acts. The findings of the analysis reveal that non-literal language expressions are more frequent in scenes involving humor

References

Aitchison , J. (2003). Teach Yourself Linguistics. London: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Austin , J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Beaugrande , R., & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London : Longman .
Briner , B. J. (2013). Introduction to Pragmatics . UK: A John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Bublitz, W., & Norrick, N. R. (2011). Foundations of Pragmatics . Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Chapman , S. (2011). Pragmatics. United Kingdom : Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Coulthard , M. (1977). An Introduction to Discouse (2nd ed). London : Longman .
Cutting , J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse . London : Routledge.
Falkum , I. L. (2021). The Deveploment of Non-Literal Uses of Languages: Sense Conventions and Pragmatic Competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 188, 97-107.
Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English Language Education. London & NewYork : Taylor & Francis Group.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech arts, Cole et al., 41-58.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words (MA). Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Gustiana , P. D., & Maisarah, I. (2023). The Analysis of Literal and Non-Literal Meaning in William Shakespeare's Poetry. Journal of English for Specific Purposes in Indonesia, 2(2), 89-95.
Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse Analysis (2nd ed). United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic Semantics. An Introduction. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics . UK: Blackwell Publishing .
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H.G. (1996). Oxford Introductions to Language Study. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/movies/family-plan-2023-transcript/ [accessed Dec. 3, 2025]
Published
2025-12-31
How to Cite
Talib, R. (2025). Interpreting the Non-Literal Meaning in Selected Scenes of "The Family Plan" Movie. Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Humanities Sciences, 28(4), 56-33. Retrieved from https://www.journalart.qu.edu.iq.51-77-64-103.cpanel.site/index.php/QJHS/article/view/1294
Section
Articles