التحيز للوضع الراهن لدى المطلقين
Abstract
The objectives of the study were as follows
Bias for the status quo among divorced people. The significance of statistical differences in (bias for the status quo) among divorced people according to the variables of gender, residence, economic status, and educational attainment. The researcher used the descriptive, correlational method. In order to measure the research variables of (bias toward the status quo). There is a statistically significant difference in bias for the status quo according to the gender variable and in favor of males, and there is a difference in bias for the status quo according to the housing variable and in favor of the city center, and there is a difference in bias for the status quo according to the economic status variable, and there is a difference in bias for the status quo according to the educational attainment variable.
References
• البطش، محمد وليد، وأبو زينة، فريد كامل (2007): مناهج البحث العلمي ــــ تصميم اللحث والتحليل الإحصائي، دار المسيرة للنشر والتوزيع والطباعة، عمان، الأردن.
• الجمل، آمنه محمد (2013): تأثير الانحياز للوضع الراهن على الحكم الذاتي، مجلة العلوم الاجتماعية والإنسانية، أطروحة دكتوراه.
• الخطيب، إيمان الدوسري (2017): الانحياز للوضع الراهن وعلاقته بصعوبة اتخاذ القرارات، مجلة الدراسات النفسية، رسالة ماجستير، الأردن.
• عيسوي، عبد الرحمن (1985): القياس والتجريب في علم النفس والتربية، دار النهضة العربية، بيروت.
• فريزر، كوان وآخرون (2012): تقديم علم النفس الاجتماعي، ترجمة: فارس حلمي، ط1، دار المسيرة، عمان- الأردن.
• الكبيسي، وهيب مجيد (2010): القياس النفسي بين التنظير والتطبيق، ط1، العالمية المتحدة، بيروت، لبنان.
• مرسى، كمال إبراهيم (1991): العلاقة الزوجية والصحة النفسية في الإسلام وعلم النفس. الكويت: دار القلم.
• الرشيدي، بشير (1996): الأعراض الاضطرابية المصاحبة لمشكلة الطلاق في الأسرة الكويتية بعد صدمة العدوان العراقي، حوليات كلية الآداب، جامعة الكويت، 16(108).
• Alison, C., Clarke-Stewart, A., & Cornelia, B. (2007). Divorce: Causes and Consequences. Yale University Press.
• Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650-666.
• Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139–167.
• Bless, H., Burger, A. M., Einwanger, J., & Schwarz, N. (2011). The motivational underpinnings of the impact of temporary mood on evaluative judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 528-541.
• Brown, J. D. (2010). High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: Once more with feeling. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1389-1404.
• Cohan, C. L., & Bradbury, T. N. (2011). Understanding and altering hurt feelings in marital relationships. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(4), 395-407.
• Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212-220.
• Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(3), 270-281.
• Fleming, S. M., Thomas, C. L., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(13), 605-609.
• Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. D., & Proulx, J. G. (2014). The antihero in popular culture: Life history theory and the dark triad personality traits. Review of General Psychology, 18(2), 192-199.
• Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 296-312.
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 209.
• Lang, E. V., Burnett, J. W., & Evans, R. W. (1978). Cognitive style and the perception of social problems: The effects of need for cognition and need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1365-1376.
• Mamadi, Corra. (2011). Self-serving bias. In The concise Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.
• Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
• Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213-232.
• Simon, R. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 106-1096.
• Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1990). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193-210.
• Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643-660.
• Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Manstead, A. S., & van der Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 521-541.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Humanities scinces (QJHS), University of Al-Qadisiyah as publisher of the journal.
2. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc. , will be allowed only with a written permission from Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Humanities scinces (QJHS), University of Al-Qadisiyah.
3. Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Humanities scinces (QJHS) , University of Al-Qadisiyah, the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the journal Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Humanities scinces (QJHS), University of Al-Qadisiyah are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
